Cultural Relativism and Whistleblowing Essay

apologize using the morals of heathen relativism the advantages and disadvantages of tin whistle blowing pagan relativism is the principle regarding the beliefs, values, and pr manageices of a market-gardening from the viewpoint of that culture itself (Chegg.com 2012). It is the concept that the importance of a occurrence cultural idea varies from one society or societal subgroup to another and that ethical and object lesson standards ar carnal knowledge to what a concomitant society or culture believes to be sizeable or bad, just or wrong. In other words, objurgate and wrong are culture-specific what is considered moral in one society whitethorn be considered shameful in another, and, since no universe standard of morality exists, no one has the right to judge another societys customs. tally to Philosophy All Ab off.org (2012) the view that the varied moral or ethical schemes are all equally valid is based on the idea that in that location is no ultimate standar d of good or evil so every judgment most right and wrong is a product of society. Therefore, whatever opinion on morality or morals is subject to the cultural perspective of each person.Ultimately, this agent that no moral or ethical system base be considered the best, or worst, and no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered right or wrong. pagan perspective therefore can help us understand why certain actions are considered right or wrong by a particular culture. The actions being referred to include the act of whistle blowing. Boatwright (2009 90) defines the act whistle blowing as the release of information by a genus Phallus or former member of an boldness that is evidence of illegal and/or immoral act up in the organisation or conduct in the organisation that is not in the public interest.Nadler and Schulman (2006) assert that whistle blowing is intricately linked to ethics in that it represents a persons understanding, at a deep level, that an action his or her organisation is taking is taking is harmful and that it interferes with peoples rights or is unfair or detracts from the common good. The headway therefore from a cultural relativism perspective is, through which cultures lens is the common good being viewed. If in the prevailing culture whistle blowing is a common and acceptable practice an line where the advantages of whistle blowing has been cultivated.According to Trimborn (2012) the most important of the advantages is that whistle-blowing frequently ends long-standing misconduct that would have otherwise continued. Organisations who encourage a whistle blowing culture, promote transparent structure and effective, overt communication. More importantly, whistle blowing can protect the institutions clients. Trimborn (2012) cites the example of a hospital employing a number of negligent staff members. Other, more ethically inclined, employees would need to produce such issues to the hospitals attention, pr otecting the fundamental law from possible lawsuits or repelling mishaps resulting in a patients demise. In the case of clear workplace violations of health and preventive regulations, or breach of employment laws, workers are defend and their rights upheld. With regard to research or technical issues, whistle blowers whitethorn cite internal memos and other documentation to base doubts existed about a product (such as a cover-up of certain medication dangers) or that assumed research results were knowingly published.Whistle-blowers often highlight safety concerns regarding cars or other products, thus protecting an unsuspicious public. Whistle-blowing upholds the law, protects many from the impact of wrongdoing, reveals the truth and prevents further wrongdoing. In cultures where whistle-blowing is frowned upon devastating consequences can be visited upon the whistle blower. Trimborn (2012) reveals approximately of whistle blowings negative repercussions. Firstly, it can b ring termination of the whistle-blowers services by the organization. It would be difficult to remain, no matter how excusable the decision to reveal illegalities and no matter how more than the revelations would actually benefit others. Secondly, big-time revelations could bring down the organization causing everyone to lose their jobs.Thirdly, the whistle-blower can contract stigmatized as disloyal and be discredited in some way. Fourthly, the organization and sometimes colleagues may bring some form of revenge on the whistle-blower in retribution. Thus, the whistle-blower is somehow blamed for the wrongdoing and fired without an opportunity for vindication. In communities, the whistle-blower and family may be subject to hostile treatment, viewed as playing out of self-interest with a view to gaining forward motion at others expense.In conclusion, unless culture, practice and the law insinuate that it is safe and accepted for whistle-blowers to raise a material concern ab out corruption or illegality, workers depart assume that they risk victimisation, losing their job or electronegative their career. They even risk being cast out or ostracised by the communities they emanate from. In cultures where a safety net for whistle-blowers exists the whistle-blower is marked as a person of integrity who has the backbone to do what is right no matter what. It lets others know the whistle-blower can be trusted to deal with others honestly. It likewise limits the effects of intimidation tactics designed to run whistle-blowers from taking appropriate action where necessary (Young 2007).